Metta Led Insights

Reel Governance: Hidden Figures

Written by Dr Elizabeth King | 06/07/2025 9:45:24 AM

Theodore Melfi | 2016 | 20th Century Fox
★★★★★ Governance Insight Rating

Executive Brief

"We're looking for a mathematician who can look beyond the numbers. A math that doesn't exist yet."

The film Hidden Figures offers a compelling case study in how latent expertise is unlocked to solve mission-critical challenges. It explores how an organization, under immense pressure, must learn to see beyond its established orthodoxies to find the capabilities it needs to survive and succeed. The film demonstrates that psychological safety, the integration of diverse expertise, and a commitment to continuous learning are not peripheral concerns; they are core operational requirements for any organization seeking to achieve transformational results.

The Setup

Set during the 1960s space race, the film follows three African-American mathematicians at NASA: Katherine Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan, and Mary Jackson. Their work proves crucial to the success of the Mercury and Apollo missions. The narrative provides a direct parallel for the modern board's challenge: identifying and integrating emergent, non-traditional expertise to solve complex problems that existing frameworks cannot address. The women must navigate systemic barriers to ensure their vital contributions are seen, heard, and implemented.

Governance in Action

The film powerfully demonstrates three core governance principles:

  1. The Integration of Diverse Expertise: Progress at NASA only occurs when the distinct skills of the three women—Johnson’s analytical geometry, Vaughan’s systems-level thinking, and Jackson’s engineering insights—are brought together. This illustrates that breakthrough capability is a function of integrating different cognitive strengths, not simply aggregating similar ones.
  2. The Necessity of Psychological Safety: The pivotal moments occur when leaders like Al Harrison actively dismantle barriers, stating, “Here at NASA, we all pee the same colour.” By creating pockets of psychological safety, he enables Katherine Johnson to bring her full intellect to the high-stakes environment of the Space Task Group, unlocking solutions that the homogenous team had missed.
  3. The Practice of Constructive Dissent: The film’s climax hinges on Katherine Johnson’s willingness to challenge established assumptions and speak truth to power. Her insistence on verifying the electronic computer’s calculations is a clear example of the constructive dissent that effective governance requires to prevent catastrophic errors.

Behind the Camera

Director Theodore Melfi structured the film to emphasise collaborative intelligence over individual heroics. Cross-cutting between the three storylines shows how different forms of expertise develop simultaneously and ultimately converge to solve shared challenges. The cinematography during calculation sequences visualises the integration of diverse thinking style - intuitive pattern recognition, systematic analysis, and creative problem-solving.

The performances by Taraji P. Henson, Octavia Spencer, and Janelle Monáe capture the integration of technical excellence with the interpersonal wisdom that I have shown to be essential for collective capability. Each character demonstrates both individual mindfulness (attention regulation under pressure, awareness of systemic dynamics) and collective wisdom (stakeholder consideration, ethical intention and adaptive response).

The film's attention to period detail reinforces themes about the evolution of capability and organisational learning. The transition from human computers to electronic systems parallels the skills evolution challenge that modern boards face as digital transformation reshapes strategic landscapes.

The Business Case

Hidden Figures provides a clear business case for a continuous learning orientation. Dorothy Vaughan’s proactive decision to learn the FORTRAN programming language is a model for how boards must anticipate and acquire future-fit skills. Her actions demonstrate that waiting for a formal mandate to adapt leads to obsolescence. The film shows that the most valuable capabilities are often developed at the periphery of an organization, and it is leadership’s responsibility to identify and cultivate them.

Cultural Context 

The film uses a specific historical moment to diagnose a timeless organizational dynamic: the persistent tension between established structures and emergent sources of value. Its narrative is highly relevant to contemporary governance challenges, from digital transformation to stakeholder engagement. It validates the premise that the strategic integration of diverse perspectives is a crucial driver of performance and resilience in high-stakes environments. 

Boardroom Application

  • Surface Latent Expertise: Before making a key decision, ask: “Whose perspective is missing from this room?” and “What expertise exists within our organization that we are not currently hearing from?”
  • Audit Your Skillsets: Channel Dorothy Vaughan by proactively mapping the board’s current competencies against future strategic needs. Initiate structured protocols for capability development to address the gaps.
  • Protect Constructive Dissent: Model Al Harrison’s leadership. When a board member challenges a prevailing assumption, explicitly protect and amplify their voice to ensure the idea is fully explored, not dismissed.